Turion II Ultra M620 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300
Aggregate performance score
Turion II Ultra M620 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion II Ultra M620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3296 | 2879 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Solo | AMD Turion II Ultra |
| Power efficiency | 2.75 | 1.38 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $262 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion II Ultra M620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion II Ultra M620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion II Ultra M620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 0.51 |
| Recency | 20 August 2008 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 600% lower power consumption.
Turion II Ultra M620, on the other hand, has a 218.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Turion II Ultra M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion II Ultra M620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
