Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Core 2 Duo T5900
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo T5900 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by an impressive 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2996 | 3228 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.11 | 0.32 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Newark (2003) |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | August 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128K |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | no data |
| Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | Socket P | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| AMT | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.41 | 0.21 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 62 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T5900 has a 95.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 77.1% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo T5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5900 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
