Mobile Sempron M100 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008, $262
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.15
Mobile Sempron M100
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.20
+33.3%

Mobile Sempron M100 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking36023512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency1.150.34
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Caspian (2009)
Release date20 August 2008 (17 years ago)10 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache3 MB512 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956S
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataAMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX
VirusProtect-+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.20
Recency 20 August 2008 10 September 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 400% lower power consumption.

Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Mobile Sempron M100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Mobile Sempron M100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.