3015Ce vs Celeron M U3400

Place in the ranking	3121	2265
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency	1.52	20.82
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	no data	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.06 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus rate	2500 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	192 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	2 MB	4 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	BGA1288	FT5
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB

no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	1.32
Recency	24 May 2010	4 August 2020
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	6 Watt

3015Ce has a 355.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The 3015Ce is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M U3400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and 3015Ce, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.