E1-2200 vs Celeron M U3400
Aggregate performance score
E1-2200 outperforms Celeron M U3400 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3106 | 3102 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD E-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.52 | 3.15 |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 24 May 2010 (14 years ago) | 5 November 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1288 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | FMA4 |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| PowerGating | - | + |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| IOMMU 2.0 | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 8210 |
| Enduro | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
| UVD | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.29 | 0.30 |
| Recency | 24 May 2010 | 5 November 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 9 Watt |
E1-2200 has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M U3400 and E1-2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
