Celeron 900 vs Athlon II Neo K325

Place in the ranking	3147	3149
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	AMD Athlon II Neo	no data
Power efficiency	2.04	0.70
Architecture codename	Geneva (2010)	no data
Release date	12 May 2010 (14 years ago)	1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	no data
Base clock speed	no data	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.3 GHz	no data
Bus rate	2000 MHz	no data
L1 cache	256 KB	no data
L2 cache	1 MB	no data
L3 cache	no data	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	45 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	S1	PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0	no data
PowerNow	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-

Security technologies

Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-x	no data	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II Neo K325 0.26

Celeron 900 0.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II Neo K325 417
+1.2%

Celeron 900 412

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II Neo K325 158

Celeron 900 220
+39.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II Neo K325 287
+22.6%

Celeron 900 234