UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.39

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 223% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1004657
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.6120.69
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGen. 11Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24256
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−200%
24−27
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−183%
16−18
+183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Hitman 3 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−54.5%
16−18
+54.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−367%
27−30
+367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 833% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 43 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.39 4.49
Recency 11 January 2021 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 223% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
R5 M255 Radeon R5 M255
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
GT 435M GeForce GT 435M
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
A10G A10G
vs
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
A2 PCIe A2 PCIe
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
vs
RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
PRO W6300 Radeon PRO W6300
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
vs
H100 SXM5 80 GB H100 SXM5 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB H100 PCIe 96 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 389 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.