UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 857 | 662 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 15.66 | 20.75 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 (2021) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Gen. 11 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4.8 - 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 20.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | no data | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | no data | System Shared |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 12
−75%
| 21−24
+75%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Elden Ring | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−55.6%
|
14−16
+55.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Dota 2 | 6
−133%
|
14−16
+133%
|
| Elden Ring | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−91.7%
|
21−24
+91.7%
|
| Fortnite | 12−14
−117%
|
24−27
+117%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6
−180%
|
14−16
+180%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−77.3%
|
35−40
+77.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−55.6%
|
14−16
+55.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−66.7%
|
14−16
+66.7%
|
| World of Tanks | 40−45
−74.4%
|
75−80
+74.4%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| Dota 2 | 16
−87.5%
|
30−33
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−64.3%
|
21−24
+64.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−58.3%
|
18−20
+58.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−77.3%
|
35−40
+77.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Elden Ring | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−100%
|
30−33
+100%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| World of Tanks | 14−16
−113%
|
30−35
+113%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
| Valorant | 8−9
−62.5%
|
12−14
+62.5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−87.5%
|
30−33
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Valorant | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Valorant | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Valorant | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is 75% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 42 tests (81%)
- there's a draw in 10 tests (19%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.27 | 4.51 |
| Recency | 11 January 2021 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 15 Watt |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 98.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.
The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
