UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
VS
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
2019
12 Watt
2.71

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking763672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.5620.43
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameIce Lake G1 Gen. 11Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 May 2019 (5 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
4K9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Counter-Strike 2 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 8
−113%
16−18
+113%
Counter-Strike 2 16
−6.3%
16−18
+6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Valorant 45−50
−21.7%
55−60
+21.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Counter-Strike 2 4
−325%
16−18
+325%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
−147%
70−75
+147%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 22
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
Metro Exodus 2
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−20%
12−14
+20%
Valorant 45−50
−21.7%
55−60
+21.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Dota 2 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−83.3%
10−12
+83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−140%
12−14
+140%
Valorant 45−50
−21.7%
55−60
+21.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−45.5%
30−35
+45.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−28%
30−35
+28%
Valorant 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

This is how UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 38% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 750 is 33% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 325% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 51 test (93%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.71 3.88
Recency 28 May 2019 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 43.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
GT 650M GeForce GT 650M
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake) Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 376 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 408 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.