UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs UHD Graphics 750

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 750 with UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 750
2021
15 Watt
4.50
+95.7%

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking662853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.58no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.80no data
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+90.9%
11
−90.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+54.5%
11
−54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+21.4%
14
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+240%
5
−240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+22.2%
35−40
−22.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+115%
12−14
−115%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics 750 and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 91% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 51 test (91%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.50 2.30
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 750 has a 95.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 390 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 361 vote

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.