TITAN RTX vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 2350$
Games supported 100%
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1350
  • Max video memory 24 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1650
  • Max video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 15500
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 367$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating3226
Value for money4.9951.86
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameTU102Turing TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 December 2018 (3 years ago)2 July 2019 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $699
Current price$2350 (0.9x MSRP)$367 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46083072
Core clock speed1350 MHz1650 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1815 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)280 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8348.5

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s495.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++
G-SYNC supportno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 48.20
RTX 2080 Super 49.95
+3.6%
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

TITAN RTX 18858
RTX 2080 Super 19545
+3.6%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

TITAN RTX 49589
+21.1%
RTX 2080 Super 40963

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 177748
+26.6%
RTX 2080 Super 140388

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 27904
+19.4%
RTX 2080 Super 23364

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

TITAN RTX 35758
+30.5%
RTX 2080 Super 27398

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

TITAN RTX 130556
+15.5%
RTX 2080 Super 113021

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

TITAN RTX 532231
+3.2%
RTX 2080 Super 515887

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

TITAN RTX 94050
+0.5%
RTX 2080 Super 93540

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

TITAN RTX 166517
+32.1%
RTX 2080 Super 126056

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160
+12.7%
142
−12.7%
1440p113
+14.1%
99
−14.1%
4K87
+22.5%
71
−22.5%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+5.1%
99
−5.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 104
+10.6%
94
−10.6%
Battlefield 5 163
+33.6%
122
−33.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 213
+11.5%
191
−11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Far Cry 5 165
+51.4%
109
−51.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
+37.8%
98
−37.8%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+30.8%
143
−30.8%
Hitman 3 222
+12.7%
197
−12.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 142
+13.6%
125
−13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 133
+5.6%
126
−5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
+50%
116
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 112
−1.8%
114
+1.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95
+9.2%
87
−9.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+11.4%
79
−11.4%
Battlefield 5 164
+49.1%
110
−49.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 180
+16.9%
154
−16.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−5.1%
80−85
+5.1%
Far Cry 5 156
+48.6%
105
−48.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 129
+35.8%
95
−35.8%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+31%
142
−31%
Hitman 3 206
+19.1%
173
−19.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+13.5%
104
−13.5%
Metro Exodus 134
+44.1%
93
−44.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+20.8%
77
−20.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 165
+43.5%
115
−43.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+36.9%
195
−36.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 97
−2.1%
99
+2.1%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 79
+16.2%
68
−16.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+14.3%
70
−14.3%
Battlefield 5 160
+22.1%
131
−22.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−14.1%
89
+14.1%
Far Cry 5 146
+37.7%
106
−37.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 117
+25.8%
93
−25.8%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+31.6%
133
−31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+27.5%
109
−27.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 86
+14.7%
75
−14.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 131
+19.1%
110
−19.1%
Hitman 3 145
+26.1%
115
−26.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90
+20%
75
−20%
Metro Exodus 85
+34.9%
63
−34.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+23.5%
51
−23.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+31.5%
92
−31.5%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−11.5%
58
+11.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+15.8%
57
−15.8%
Battlefield 5 95−100
−12.5%
108
+12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+15.8%
57
−15.8%
Far Cry 5 134
+34%
100
−34%
Far Cry New Dawn 114
+26.7%
90
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+34.2%
117
−34.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
+22.8%
57
−22.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+21.5%
65
−21.5%
Hitman 3 82
+28.1%
64
−28.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 54
+22.7%
44
−22.7%
Metro Exodus 55
+37.5%
40
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+24.2%
33
−24.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+34.7%
49
−34.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+30.4%
79
−30.4%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+26.8%
41
−26.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+19.4%
36
−19.4%
Battlefield 5 97
+42.6%
68
−42.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+6.5%
31
−6.5%
Far Cry 5 80
+31.1%
61
−31.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+30.2%
63
−30.2%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+40.7%
81
−40.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+26.5%
34
−26.5%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 48.20 49.95
Recency 18 December 2018 2 July 2019
Cost $2499 $699
Memory bus width 384 256
Pipelines / CUDA cores 4608 3072
Memory bandwidth 672 495.9
Thermal design power (TDP) 280 Watt 250 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA TITAN RTX
NVIDIA TITAN RTX

and

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of TITAN RTX by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to TITAN RTX from AMD is Radeon RX 6700, which is slower by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to TITAN RTX:

Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Super by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 6700 XT, which is slower by 1% and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Super:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 669 ratings

Rate NVIDIA TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1181 rating

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.