Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
P2200 vs M5000
Price now
581$
Games supported
92%
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 861 MHz
- Max video memory 8GB GDDR5
- Memory type 256-bit
- Memory clock speed 6612 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1000 MHz
- Max video memory 5 GB
- Memory type GDDR5X
- Memory clock speed 10008 MHz
- Maximum resolution
Price now
604$
Games supported
92%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 175 | 168 |
| Value for money | 5.41 | 12.14 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | GP106 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 June 2015 (7 years old) | 10 June 2019 (3 years old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | no data |
| Current price | $581 (0.2x MSRP) | $604 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 4,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 132.9 | 119.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | no data |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 201 mm |
| Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | None |
| SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | 256 Bit | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 211 GB/s | 200.2 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | DVI-I DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo | 4x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | no data |
| Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | + | no data |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| High-Performance Video I/O6 | + | no data |
| nView Desktop Management | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Quadro P2200 outperforms Quadro M5000 by 2% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
Quadro P2200 outperforms Quadro M5000 by 14% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Quadro P2200 outperforms Quadro M5000 by 22% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro M5000 and Quadro P2200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 511 Mh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 23.24 | 23.77 |
| Recency | 29 June 2015 | 10 June 2019 |
| Memory bus width | 256 | 160 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 1280 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro M5000 by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro M5000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W5500, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro M5000:
Competitors of Quadro P2200 by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to Quadro P2200 by AMD is Radeon Pro W5500, which is slower by 2% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P2200:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
