Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs RX Vega 56

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 56 with Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire, including specs and performance data.

RX Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2, 210 Watt
32.71
+79.4%

RX Vega 56 outperforms R9 M290X Crossfire by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking154298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.02no data
Power efficiency11.236.57
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameVega 10Neptune CF
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1156 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1471 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million2x 2800 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5no data
Floating-point processing power10.54 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2x 4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (FL 11_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 32.71
+79.4%
R9 M290X Crossfire 18.23

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 56 29086
+106%
R9 M290X Crossfire 14147

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX Vega 56 54586
+66.5%
R9 M290X Crossfire 32792

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 56 20759
+96.7%
R9 M290X Crossfire 10551

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 56 125359
+74.2%
R9 M290X Crossfire 71977

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
+85.5%
62
−85.5%
1440p74
+85%
40−45
−85%
4K48
+100%
24−27
−100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.47no data
1440p5.39no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+109%
30−35
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+89.5%
35−40
−89.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 88
+44.3%
60−65
−44.3%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+109%
30−35
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+89.5%
35−40
−89.5%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+101%
80−85
−101%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Metro Exodus 96
+84.6%
50−55
−84.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+56.8%
40−45
−56.8%
Valorant 130−140
+76.6%
75−80
−76.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 156
+156%
60−65
−156%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+109%
30−35
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+89.5%
35−40
−89.5%
Dota 2 63
−7.9%
65−70
+7.9%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+42.2%
60−65
−42.2%
Fortnite 140
+37.3%
100−110
−37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+101%
80−85
−101%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+40.3%
65−70
−40.3%
Metro Exodus 73
+40.4%
50−55
−40.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+45.4%
130−140
−45.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+56.8%
40−45
−56.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+96.7%
60−65
−96.7%
Valorant 130−140
+76.6%
75−80
−76.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+23%
220−230
−23%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80
+31.1%
60−65
−31.1%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+109%
30−35
−109%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+89.5%
35−40
−89.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+63.2%
65−70
−63.2%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+42.2%
60−65
−42.2%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+101%
80−85
−101%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+74.5%
50−55
−74.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Valorant 130−140
+76.6%
75−80
−76.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+38.5%
110−120
−38.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
World of Tanks 210−220
+68.5%
130−140
−68.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 67
+71.8%
35−40
−71.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+120%
14−16
−120%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+114%
50−55
−114%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+95.9%
45−50
−95.9%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+86.7%
30−33
−86.7%
Metro Exodus 74
+72.1%
40−45
−72.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%
Valorant 100−110
+108%
45−50
−108%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Dota 2 50
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 50
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%
Metro Exodus 27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+91.2%
55−60
−91.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+56.3%
30−35
−56.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+84.2%
18−20
−84.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Dota 2 65−70
+103%
30−35
−103%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+96%
24−27
−96%
Fortnite 45−50
+100%
21−24
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Valorant 50−55
+136%
21−24
−136%

This is how RX Vega 56 and R9 M290X Crossfire compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is 85% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 56 is 85% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 56 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 156% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M290X Crossfire is 16% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
  • R9 M290X Crossfire is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.71 18.23
Recency 14 August 2017 1 March 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 200 Watt

RX Vega 56 has a 79.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

R9 M290X Crossfire, on the other hand, has 5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 820 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.