Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition vs R9 M290X Crossfire
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 333 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.53 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN (2012−2015) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Neptune CF | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2014 (11 years ago) | 8 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1406 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | 1677 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 2800 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 429.3 |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | no data | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2014 | 8 August 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | 225 Watt |
R9 M290X Crossfire has 12.5% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Limited Edition is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
