Radeon 780M vs RX 6500

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6500
19.85
+8.4%

RX 6500 outperforms 780M by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking278301
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiencyno data83.65
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameno dataHawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release dateno data6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 19.85
+8.4%
Radeon 780M 18.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6500 7649
+8.4%
Radeon 780M 7059

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
1440p21−24
+5%
20
−5%
4K14−16
+7.7%
13
−7.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−21.9%
39
+21.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3.2%
31
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+10%
60−65
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+4.6%
85−90
−4.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+8.1%
35−40
−8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
Hitman 3 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+6.7%
90−95
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+9.5%
60−65
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+22.2%
54
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+7.1%
40−45
−7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+4.6%
85−90
−4.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.3%
40−45
−7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+39.1%
23
−39.1%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+7%
40−45
−7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+7%
110−120
−7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+55.2%
29
−55.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+406%
18
−406%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+9.6%
90−95
−9.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+33.3%
15
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+8%
24−27
−8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+0%
53
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+0%
17
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX 6500 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 780M is 3% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 is 8% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 406% faster.
  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 780M is 22% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 is ahead in 50 tests (69%)
  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.85 18.32

RX 6500 has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6500 and Radeon 780M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1535 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.