Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 3.04% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

AMD started Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) sales 14 January 2014. This is a GCN architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use.

General info

Some basic facts about Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking725
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameKaveri Spectre
Market segmentDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Technical specs

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed720 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Shared memory+

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop). The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 3.04

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2302

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1616

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 10341

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 91999

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 20

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Metro Exodus 4−5
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
Metro Exodus 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7

Relative performance

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.


Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 100

NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is GeForce 840A, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our ranking.

GeForce 840AGeForce840A
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop):

Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 100
GeForce 830A 96.71
GeForce 940A 94.08

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

HD Graphics 630HDGraphics 630
Compare
HD Graphics P630HDGraphics P630
Compare
R7 250Radeon R7250
Compare
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)Radeon R7384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Compare
GTX 550 TiGeForce GTX550 Ti
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.