Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 and Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 460
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.62
+249%

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking400733
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.19no data
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 11 / Baffin XTKaveri Spectre
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2016 (7 years ago)14 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data
Current price$397 (4.6x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896512
Core clock speed1090 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate67.20no data
Floating-point performance2,150 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 10.62
+249%
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 3.04

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 460 8597
+273%
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2302

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 273% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 460 5701
+253%
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1616

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 253% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 460 34892
+237%
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 10341

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 237% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 460 307888
+235%
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 91999

RX 460 outperforms R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 235% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+121%
19
−121%
1440p83
+295%
21−24
−295%
4K20
+300%
5−6
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34
+467%
6−7
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+275%
8−9
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+338%
12−14
−338%
Hitman 3 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 138
+626%
18−20
−626%
Metro Exodus 44
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+367%
6−7
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Battlefield 5 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+292%
12−14
−292%
Hitman 3 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+132%
18−20
−132%
Metro Exodus 36
+3500%
1−2
−3500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+270%
10
−270%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+215%
12−14
−215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 36
+89.5%
18−20
−89.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+283%
6
−283%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+118%
16−18
−118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hitman 3 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 25
+213%
8−9
−213%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hitman 3 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+300%
3−4
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Metro Exodus 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

This is how RX 460 and R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 121% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 is 295% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 460 is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 460 surpassed R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.62 3.04
Recency 8 August 2016 14 January 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 912 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 14 votes

Rate Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.