Radeon R7 250: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 2.77% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

AMD started Radeon R7 250 sales 1 October 2013 at a recommended price of $89 . This is a GCN architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at office use. 2 GB of DDR3, GDDR5 memory clocked at 1.15 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 72 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x8 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 168 mm. N/A power connector is required, and power consumption is at 75 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about Radeon R7 250: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking760
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Value for money0.10
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameOland XT
Market segmentDesktop
Designreference
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89
Current price$256 (2.9x MSRP)of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Radeon R7 250's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R7 250's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Boost clock speed1050 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors950 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate25.20of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance716.8 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Radeon R7 250 and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8
Length168 mm
Width2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsN/A

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R7 250: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed1150 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R7 250. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI+
DisplayPort support-

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R7 250. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+
CrossFire1
Enduro-
FreeSync1
HD3D-
PowerTune-
TrueAudio-
ZeroCore-
DDMA audio+

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R7 250, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Mantle-

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R7 250. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 250 2.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 250 1072

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 250 12581

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 250 2775

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 250 2145

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 250 15080

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

R7 250 27

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon R7 250 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Battlefield 5 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Battlefield 5 6−7
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
Metro Exodus 4−5
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
Battlefield 5 6−7
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Hitman 3 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
Metro Exodus 1−2
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
Hitman 3 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
Far Cry 5 4−5
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7

Relative performance

Radeon R7 250's performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop video cards.


NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R7 250 is GeForce GTX 850A, which is slower by 2% and lower by 6 positions in our ranking.

GTX 850AGeForce GTX850A
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 250:

GeForce 830A 106.14
GeForce 940A 103.25
Radeon R7 250 100
GeForce 920A 79.06

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)Radeon R7384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Compare
R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)Radeon R7512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Compare
HD Graphics P630HDGraphics P630
Compare
GT 710GeForce GT710
Compare
GTX 550 TiGeForce GTX550 Ti
Compare
GT 430GeForce GT430
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R7 250 according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.6 408 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R7 250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.