Quadro T2000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

Place in performance ranking	543	250
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.14	4.70
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data
Current price	$740 (3.7x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T2000 Mobile has 50% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.44	114.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	MXM Module	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.27

T2000 Mobile 20.63
+229%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 229% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 3200 2428

T2000 Mobile 7985
+229%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 229% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro WX 3200 4338

T2000 Mobile 13524
+212%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 212% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −216%	60−65 +216%
4K	8 −200%	24−27 +200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−230%

30−35
+230%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −184%	50−55 +184%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	20 −170%	50−55 +170%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%
Hitman 3	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −209%	30−35 +209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −184%	50−55 +184%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	18 −200%	50−55 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%
Hitman 3	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Metro Exodus	10 −230%	30−35 +230%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −209%	30−35 +209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −200%	45−50 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −245%	65−70 +245%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Far Cry 5	17 −218%	50−55 +218%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −233%	70−75 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −350%	45−50 +350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −344%	40−45 +344%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −244%	30−35 +244%
Hitman 3	10−11 −230%	30−35 +230%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −400%	20−22 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1800%	18−20 +1800%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −820%	45−50 +820%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −457%	35−40 +457%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −360%	21−24 +360%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Hitman 3	6−7 −217%	18−20 +217%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −320%	21−24 +320%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	4−5
Far Cry 5	6−7 −183%	16−18 +183%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%