GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire

Place in the ranking	297	271
Place by popularity	not in top-100	62
Power efficiency	6.40	27.80
Architecture	GCN (2012−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Neptune CF	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 May 2012 (12 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1024
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	95.04
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.140
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 8970M Crossfire 18.64

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.24
+8.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 8970M Crossfire 12424

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+6.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 8970M Crossfire 34215

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+27.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 8970M Crossfire 10354
+4.3%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 70114
+7.6%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD 8970M Crossfire 269832

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+52%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	67 +15.5%	58 −15.5%
1440p	40−45 −17.5%	47 +17.5%
4K	18−21 −22.2%	22 +22.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−33

−96.7%

59
+96.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −41.9%	61 +41.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 −53.1%	49 +53.1%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −35.9%	53 +35.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −53.3%	46 +53.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −64.7%	84 +64.7%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −4.2%	120−130 +4.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 −37.8%	51 +37.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −94.6%	181 +94.6%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −37.9%	91 +37.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +15.9%	44 −15.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −6.3%	65−70 +6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −126%	201 +126%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +0%	32 +0%
Battlefield 5	60−65 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −20.5%	47 +20.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −20%	36 +20%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −28.9%	58 +28.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −15.7%	59 +15.7%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −4.2%	120−130 +4.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 −35.1%	50 +35.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −93.5%	180 +93.5%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −19.7%	79 +19.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 +30.8%	39 −30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −19%	75 +19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −106%	183 +106%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +59.3%	27 −59.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +113%	15 −113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +25.8%	31 −25.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −13.3%	34 +13.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +15.4%	39 −15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −4.2%	120−130 +4.2%
Hitman 3	35−40 −16.2%	43 +16.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +45.3%	64 −45.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 +0%	63 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +10.3%	39 −10.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 +305%	22 −305%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
+24.4%

−24.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −5.4%	35−40 +5.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −31%	38 +31%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −4.8%	21−24 +4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −45.5%	16 +45.5%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −18.2%	26 +18.2%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 −7.6%	110−120 +7.6%
Hitman 3	21−24 −27.3%	28 +27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −5.1%	40−45 +5.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −7.9%	40−45 +7.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −4.5%	21−24 +4.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 −5.3%	120 +5.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−3.1%

30−35
+3.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −42.9%	20 +42.9%
Hitman 3	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 +133%	42 −133%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −10%	21−24 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −31.6%	25 +31.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6 +50%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −7.7%	27−30 +7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−5.9%

18−20
+5.9%

This is how HD 8970M Crossfire and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

HD 8970M Crossfire is 16% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 18% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 22% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 8970M Crossfire is 305% faster.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 126% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD 8970M Crossfire is ahead in 11 tests (15%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 58 tests (81%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	18.64	20.24
Recency	1 May 2012	23 April 2020
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.