Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in performance ranking	254	73
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.49	21.49
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Generation 12.7 (2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	$289
Current price	$582 (0.7x MSRP)	$625 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 105% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	3584
Core clock speed	no data	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.0	537.6
Floating-point performance	5,728 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.43

Arc A750 43.76
+114%

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 7100 by 114% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 7100 7898

Arc A750 11930
+51.1%

Arc A750 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 7100 by 51% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	45−50 −131%	104 +131%
1440p	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
4K	16−18 −138%	38 +138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30−35

−112%

70−75
+112%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −51.2%	62 +51.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −157%	90 +157%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −109%	140−150 +109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −116%	95−100 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −89.3%	100−110 +89.3%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −67.2%	112 +67.2%
Hitman 3	45−50 −122%	100−110 +122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −191%	195 +191%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −136%	144 +136%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −80.4%	100−110 +80.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −383%	285 +383%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −153%	96 +153%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −34.1%	55 +34.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −117%	76 +117%
Battlefield 5	65−70 −109%	140−150 +109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −116%	95−100 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −30.8%	68 +30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +1.8%	55 −1.8%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −58.2%	106 +58.2%
Hitman 3	45−50 −122%	100−110 +122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −142%	162 +142%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −80.3%	110 +80.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −80.4%	100−110 +80.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 −195%	174 +195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −320%	185 +320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −134%	89 +134%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −9.8%	45 +9.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −97.1%	69 +97.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −116%	95−100 +116%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −112%	70−75 +112%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −34.3%	90 +34.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −68.7%	113 +68.7%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −62.3%	99 +62.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −56.8%	69 +56.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −65.8%	63 +65.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−80.4%

100−110
+80.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −121%	85−90 +121%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −212%	128 +212%
Hitman 3	30−33 −86.7%	55−60 +86.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −140%	35−40 +140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −72.7%	38 +72.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −184%	54 +184%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −162%	65−70 +162%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −124%	76 +124%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −97.5%	79 +97.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −119%	92 +119%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −126%	86 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −245%	145 +245%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −148%	57 +148%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −257%	50 +257%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 −42.5%	57 +42.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −264%	80 +264%
Hitman 3	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −148%	55−60 +148%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −214%	44 +214%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −229%	69 +229%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −115%	28 +115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 −173%	30 +173%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −121%	50−55 +121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −187%	40−45 +187%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −118%	61 +118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −152%	58 +152%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −174%	52 +174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −275%	30 +275%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−122%

40−45
+122%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 131% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 137% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 138% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 2% faster than the Arc A750.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A750 is 383% faster than the Pro WX 7100.

All in all, in popular games: