Radeon Pro 5300M vs Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon Pro 5300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 560X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.20

Pro 5300M outperforms Pro 560X by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7812.60
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241280
Core clock speed1004 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate64.26100.0
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.20
Pro 5300M 14.96
+62.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
Pro 5300M 5977
+62.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
1440p41
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
4K16
−50%
24−27
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
Metro Exodus 36
−19.4%
40−45
+19.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 36
−5.6%
35−40
+5.6%
Valorant 46
−37%
60−65
+37%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%
Dota 2 46
−21.7%
55−60
+21.7%
Far Cry 5 42
−35.7%
55−60
+35.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−53.6%
85−90
+53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
−69.7%
55−60
+69.7%
Metro Exodus 23
−87%
40−45
+87%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 34
−226%
110−120
+226%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10
−280%
35−40
+280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−65.5%
45−50
+65.5%
Valorant 21
−200%
60−65
+200%
World of Tanks 86
−131%
190−200
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
−61.3%
50−55
+61.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%
Dota 2 69
+23.2%
55−60
−23.2%
Far Cry 5 37
−54.1%
55−60
+54.1%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−68.4%
60−65
+68.4%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−70.8%
40−45
+70.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−50%
110−120
+50%
Valorant 26
−142%
60−65
+142%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−209%
140−150
+209%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
World of Tanks 57
−89.5%
100−110
+89.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 24
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−85.7%
35−40
+85.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Valorant 19
−105%
35−40
+105%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Dota 2 13
−108%
27−30
+108%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−108%
27−30
+108%
Metro Exodus 7
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−76.9%
45−50
+76.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−108%
27−30
+108%
World of Tanks 30
−50%
45−50
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 12
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Fortnite 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Valorant 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%

This is how Pro 560X and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5300M is 58% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5300M is 59% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5300M is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 560X is 23% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 280% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 560X is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Pro 5300M is ahead in 63 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.20 14.96
Recency 16 July 2018 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 560X has 13.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 193 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 172 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.