Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560X with Quadro P620, including specs and performance data.

Pro 560X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.51
+0.4%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking471474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7516.34
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 21GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024512
Core clock speed1004 MHz1177 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1443 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate64.2646.18
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 560X 9.51
+0.4%
Quadro P620 9.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+0.5%
Quadro P620 3660

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590
+28.4%
Quadro P620 5909

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560X 5699
+22%
Quadro P620 4673

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449
+6.7%
Quadro P620 30410

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro 560X 17548
+45.2%
Quadro P620 12084

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 255217
Quadro P620 310112
+21.5%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Pro 560X 17037
+55.9%
Quadro P620 10928

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Pro 560X 1614
+16.3%
Quadro P620 1388

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−14.6%
47
+14.6%
1440p43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
4K17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 43
+10.3%
35−40
−10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+27.6%
27−30
−27.6%
Fortnite 66
−71.2%
113
+71.2%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+35.9%
35−40
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+1.1%
85−90
−1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 36
−8.3%
35−40
+8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86
−59.3%
130−140
+59.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 71
−26.8%
90
+26.8%
Far Cry 5 33
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Fortnite 40
−5%
42
+5%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+28.2%
35−40
−28.2%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
−3%
30−35
+3%
Metro Exodus 19
+11.8%
17
−11.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+25%
30−35
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+6.3%
32
−6.3%
Valorant 85−90
+1.1%
85−90
−1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 33
−18.2%
35−40
+18.2%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 69
−20.3%
83
+20.3%
Far Cry 5 31
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−8.3%
35−40
+8.3%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Valorant 26
−235%
85−90
+235%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+10.3%
29
−10.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 57
−19.3%
65−70
+19.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Metro Exodus 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Pro 560X and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P620 is 15% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 560X is 8% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 560X is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 560X is 75% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P620 is 235% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 560X is ahead in 20 tests (30%)
  • Quadro P620 is ahead in 12 tests (18%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.51 9.47
Recency 16 July 2018 1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

Pro 560X has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 560X and Quadro P620.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 193 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 641 vote

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560X or Quadro P620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.