Radeon Pro 5600M vs Pro 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560X and Radeon Pro 5600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 560X
2018
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.54

Pro 5600M outperforms Pro 560X by a whopping 151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking464233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7132.82
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 12
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date16 July 2018 (6 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1004 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate64.26164.8
Floating-point processing power2.056 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.54
Pro 5600M 23.96
+151%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
Pro 5600M 9232
+151%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−144%
100−110
+144%
1440p39
−144%
95−100
+144%
4K12
−150%
30−35
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
−67.7%
50−55
+67.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Battlefield 5 49
−59.2%
75−80
+59.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
−69%
45−50
+69%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Far Cry 5 28
−96.4%
55−60
+96.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−65.8%
60−65
+65.8%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−120%
140−150
+120%
Hitman 3 18−20
−167%
45−50
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−109%
110−120
+109%
Metro Exodus 41
−100%
80−85
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 36
−75%
60−65
+75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−62.9%
100−110
+62.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
−4%
50−55
+4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Battlefield 5 42
−85.7%
75−80
+85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
−96%
45−50
+96%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Far Cry 5 26
−112%
55−60
+112%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
−125%
60−65
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−120%
140−150
+120%
Hitman 3 18−20
−167%
45−50
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−109%
110−120
+109%
Metro Exodus 33
−148%
80−85
+148%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
−117%
60−65
+117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−161%
80−85
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−62.9%
100−110
+62.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−271%
50−55
+271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−172%
45−50
+172%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−160%
35−40
+160%
Far Cry 5 19
−189%
55−60
+189%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−292%
140−150
+292%
Hitman 3 18−20
−167%
45−50
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−109%
110−120
+109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−161%
80−85
+161%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−160%
50−55
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−62.9%
100−110
+62.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 25
−152%
60−65
+152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−140%
35−40
+140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−178%
24−27
+178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−232%
130−140
+232%
Hitman 3 12−14
−115%
27−30
+115%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−145%
45−50
+145%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−221%
45−50
+221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−333%
50−55
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−222%
27−30
+222%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−127%
130−140
+127%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−150%
40−45
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−171%
18−20
+171%
Hitman 3 6−7
−217%
18−20
+217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−208%
120−130
+208%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−175%
30−35
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

This is how Pro 560X and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 144% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 144% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro 5600M surpassed Pro 560X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.54 23.96
Recency 16 July 2018 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 151.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 185 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.