Radeon 780M vs Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.96
+30.8%

Pro 5600M outperforms 780M by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233302
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiency32.8483.69
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12Phoenix
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560768
Core clock speed1000 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8129.6
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed770 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 23.96
+30.8%
Radeon 780M 18.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
+30.8%
Radeon 780M 7059

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+25%
36
−25%
1440p24−27
+20%
20
−20%
4K16−18
+23.1%
13
−23.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+30%
60−65
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+25.8%
31
−25.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+22.6%
110−120
−22.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+23.3%
90−95
−23.3%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+30.2%
60−65
−30.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+35%
60−65
−35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+16.1%
85−90
−16.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+30%
60−65
−30%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+62.5%
24
−62.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+22.6%
110−120
−22.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+23.3%
90−95
−23.3%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+30.2%
60−65
−30.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+50%
54
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+23.8%
40−45
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+16.1%
85−90
−16.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+69.6%
23
−69.6%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+22.6%
110−120
−22.6%
Hitman 3 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+109%
53
−109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+76.1%
46
−76.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+79.3%
29
−79.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+461%
18
−461%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+36%
100−105
−36%
Hitman 3 27−30
+27.3%
21−24
−27.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+32.4%
35−40
−32.4%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+62.5%
32
−62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+45%
20
−45%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+23.6%
110−120
−23.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Hitman 3 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+30.9%
90−95
−30.9%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+73.3%
15
−73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+70.6%
17
−70.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

This is how Pro 5600M and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is 25% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 5600M is 20% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 5600M is 23% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 461% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.96 18.32
Recency 15 June 2020 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 5600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1549 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.