GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Place in the ranking	345	214
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	12.43	28.69
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 14	GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)	6 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	2560
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1237 MHz
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1492 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	100.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	3.2 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_2
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −80%	72 +80%
1440p	21−24 −71.4%	36 +71.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−238%

81
+238%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −64%	80−85 +64%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −64.5%	50−55 +64.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −167%	64 +167%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −61.1%	55−60 +61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −46%	140−150 +46%
Hitman 3	27−30 −75.9%	50−55 +75.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −47.4%	110−120 +47.4%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −62.3%	85−90 +62.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −70%	85−90 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −30.4%	100−110 +30.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −64%	80−85 +64%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −64.5%	50−55 +64.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −91.7%	46 +91.7%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −61.1%	55−60 +61.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −46%	140−150 +46%
Hitman 3	27−30 −75.9%	50−55 +75.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −47.4%	110−120 +47.4%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −62.3%	85−90 +62.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −72%	86 +72%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −45.9%	50−55 +45.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −30.4%	100−110 +30.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 −64.5%	50−55 +64.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −62.5%	39 +62.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −61.1%	55−60 +61.1%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −46%	140−150 +46%
Hitman 3	27−30 −75.9%	50−55 +75.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −47.4%	110−120 +47.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −52%	76 +52%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −35.1%	50 +35.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 −30.4%	100−110 +30.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−54.8%

65−70
+54.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −60%	45−50 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −92.3%	24−27 +92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −61.1%	27−30 +61.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −77.8%	140−150 +77.8%
Hitman 3	18−20 −66.7%	30−33 +66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −67.7%	50−55 +67.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −77.8%	45−50 +77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −104%	57 +104%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −131%	37 +131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 −48.4%	140−150 +48.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−68%

40−45
+68%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −81.8%	20−22 +81.8%
Hitman 3	10−12 −81.8%	20−22 +81.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −65.4%	120−130 +65.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −61.9%	30−35 +61.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −107%	30−35 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−57.1%

21−24
+57.1%

This is how Pro 5300M and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 80% faster in 1080p
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 71% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 238% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3050 6GB Mobile surpassed Pro 5300M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.42	25.13
Recency	13 November 2019	6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	85 Watt	60 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 41.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.