GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 5300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking344not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 14GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 November 2019 (4 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802048
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1057 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate100.067.65
Floating-point performance3.2 gflops4.329 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz11 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2019 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Pro 5300M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro 5300M and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 166 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 119 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.