Arc A350M vs Radeon 680M

Place in the ranking	502	362
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.94	40.05
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Rembrandt+	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	1150 MHz
Number of transistors	13,100 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	105.6	55.20
Floating-point processing power	3.379 TFLOPS	1.766 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	24
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	12	6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 680M 8.34

Arc A350M 13.99
+67.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 680M 10371

Arc A350M 10730
+3.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 680M 34600
+11.5%

Arc A350M 31023

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 680M 6865

Arc A350M 7147
+4.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 680M 43225
+19%

Arc A350M 36315

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 680M 2303

Arc A350M 3050
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	37 +5.7%	35 −5.7%
1440p	19 +18.8%	16 −18.8%
4K	10 +11.1%	9 −11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	28 +7.7%	24−27 −7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 +44.4%	27 −44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Counter-Strike 2	23 −13%	24−27 +13%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 +55.6%	9 −55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −17.9%	66 +17.9%
Forza Horizon 5	38 +18.8%	32 −18.8%
Metro Exodus	39 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
Valorant	161 +188%	56 −188%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Counter-Strike 2	21 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +37.5%	8 −37.5%
Dota 2	48 +26.3%	38 −26.3%
Far Cry 5	36 +33.3%	27 −33.3%
Fortnite	50−55 −58.8%	80−85 +58.8%
Forza Horizon 4	47 −12.8%	53 +12.8%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 −81%	35−40 +81%
Grand Theft Auto V	36 +38.5%	26 −38.5%
Metro Exodus	27 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −54.4%	100−110 +54.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −50%	35−40 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −69.2%	40−45 +69.2%
Valorant	30 −96.7%	55−60 +96.7%
World of Tanks	120−130 −47.3%	190−200 +47.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −67.9%	45−50 +67.9%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +50%	6 −50%
Dota 2	61 +3.4%	59 −3.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −45.9%	50−55 +45.9%
Forza Horizon 4	40 −12.5%	45 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 5	26 +23.8%	21 −23.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −54.4%	100−110 +54.4%
Valorant	146 +147%	55−60 −147%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	17 +70%	10 −70%
Grand Theft Auto V	17 +70%	10 −70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −200%	120−130 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
World of Tanks	60−65 −61.9%	100−110 +61.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −120%	10−12 +120%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Forza Horizon 4	27 −37%	37 +37%
Forza Horizon 5	12−14 −76.9%	21−24 +76.9%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −113%	30−35 +113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Valorant	21−24 −63.6%	35−40 +63.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Dota 2	18−20 +72.7%	11 −72.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +72.7%	11 −72.7%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +72.7%	11 −72.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −100%	14−16 +100%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	18 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
Fortnite	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Forza Horizon 4	14 −35.7%	19 +35.7%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Valorant	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%

This is how Radeon 680M and Arc A350M compete in popular games:

Radeon 680M is 6% faster in 1080p
Radeon 680M is 19% faster in 1440p
Radeon 680M is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 188% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A350M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games: