RTX 3000 Max-Q vs T2000 Max-Q

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 85%
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 600 - 870
  • Max video memory 6 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 930 / 1200
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 8000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 83%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating176228
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19E-Q1 MAX-QN19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (3 years ago)27 May 2019 (3 years ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201024
Core clock speed600 - 870 MHz930 / 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 - 1380 MHz1500 / 1620 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)60 - 70 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate175.0103.7

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and Quadro T2000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Max-Q 22.20
+26.9%
T2000 Max-Q 17.49
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 8685
+26.9%
T2000 Max-Q 6842

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 17523
+52.9%
T2000 Max-Q 11461

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 66284
+61.3%
T2000 Max-Q 41106

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 12642
+67.6%
T2000 Max-Q 7544

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 13617
+64.8%
T2000 Max-Q 8262

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 62
+21.5%
T2000 Max-Q 51

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+13.2%
T2000 Max-Q 97

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 97
+29.8%
T2000 Max-Q 75

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 44
+36.4%
T2000 Max-Q 32

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 105
+15.8%
T2000 Max-Q 91

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+23.4%
T2000 Max-Q 89

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 71
+75.2%
T2000 Max-Q 40

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 10.6
+49.3%
T2000 Max-Q 7.1

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 71
+75.2%
T2000 Max-Q 40

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 62
+21.5%
T2000 Max-Q 51

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 105
+15.8%
T2000 Max-Q 91

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+13.1%
T2000 Max-Q 97

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 97
+29.9%
T2000 Max-Q 75

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 110
+23.4%
T2000 Max-Q 89

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 44
+36.4%
T2000 Max-Q 32

Benchmark coverage: 2%

RTX 3000 Max-Q 10.6
+49.3%
T2000 Max-Q 7.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD73
+32.7%
55
−32.7%
1440p45
+73.1%
26
−73.1%
4K28
−25%
35
+25%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−23.3%
53
+23.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+107%
27−30
−107%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+26.3%
55−60
−26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94
+114%
40−45
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Far Cry 5 87
+97.7%
40−45
−97.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
Hitman 3 100
+104%
45−50
−104%
Horizon Zero Dawn 76
+111%
35−40
−111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76
+35.7%
56
−35.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
+126%
30−35
−126%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−4.7%
45
+4.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+26.3%
55−60
−26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+54.5%
40−45
−54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Far Cry 5 79
+79.5%
40−45
−79.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+5.5%
55
−5.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
Hitman 3 82
+67.3%
45−50
−67.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 61
+69.4%
35−40
−69.4%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+6.1%
33
−6.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+24.1%
27−30
−24.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 68
+51.1%
45
−51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 97
+54%
63
−54%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+96.8%
30−35
−96.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+72%
25
−72%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+26.3%
55−60
−26.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Far Cry 5 75
+70.5%
40−45
−70.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+16%
50
−16%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+24.6%
60−65
−24.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+57.6%
33
−57.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+105%
21−24
−105%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+31.6%
35−40
−31.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+31%
27−30
−31%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+31.3%
30−35
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Hitman 3 27
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+100%
16−18
−100%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+138%
8−9
−138%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+35%
20−22
−35%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+23.5%
16−18
−23.5%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 22.20 17.49
Memory bus width 192 128
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1024
Memory bandwidth 448 128
Thermal design power (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q by AMD

The nearest Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q's AMD equivalent is Radeon Pro 5600M, which is faster by 5% and higher by 11 positions in our performance rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q:

Competitors of Quadro T2000 Max-Q by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro T2000 Max-Q from AMD is Radeon Pro 5500M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro T2000 Max-Q:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 17 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 14 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.