NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q: specs and benchmarks

VS

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro T2000 Max-Q sales 27 May 2019. This is a Turing architecture notebook card based on 12 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 8 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 35 - 40 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 17.87% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

General info

Some basic facts about Quadro T2000 Max-Q: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking285
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2019 (4 years old)

Technical specs

Quadro T2000 Max-Q's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro T2000 Max-Q's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed930 / 1200 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed1500 / 1620 MHzof 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors4,700 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology12 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080)
Power consumption (TDP)35 - 40 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate103.7of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro T2000 Max-Q's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro T2000 Max-Q: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB)
Memory clock speed8000 MHzof 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro T2000 Max-Q. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

API support

APIs supported by Quadro T2000 Max-Q, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan1.2.131
CUDA7.5

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro T2000 Max-Q. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Max-Q 17.87

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

T2000 Max-Q 6926

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Max-Q 39269

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

T2000 Max-Q 11461

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T2000 Max-Q 8262

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

T2000 Max-Q 41106

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

T2000 Max-Q 75193

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 75

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 91

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 89

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 32

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

T2000 Max-Q 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 91

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 75

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 89

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 32

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 7.1

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Benchmark coverage: 2%

T2000 Max-Q 94

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

T2000 Max-Q 94

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro T2000 Max-Q is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
1440p26
4K38

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
Battlefield 5 60−65
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 45−50
Far Cry New Dawn 58
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
Hitman 3 50−55
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
Battlefield 5 60−65
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 45−50
Far Cry New Dawn 55
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
Hitman 3 50−55
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
Metro Exodus 33
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
Battlefield 5 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
Far Cry 5 45−50
Far Cry New Dawn 50
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
Hitman 3 27−30
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
Metro Exodus 16−18
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
Battlefield 5 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
Far Cry 5 30−33
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Hitman 3 16−18
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Metro Exodus 10−11
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
Battlefield 5 20−22
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
Far Cry 5 14−16
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8

Relative perfomance

Overall Quadro T2000 Max-Q performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.


AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro T2000 Max-Q is Radeon Pro 5500M, which is slower by 2% and lower by 2 positions in our ranking.

Pro 5500MRadeon Pro5500M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro T2000 Max-Q:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Pro 5500MRadeon Pro5500M
Compare
T1000 Max-QQuadro T1000Max-Q
Compare
T1000 MobileQuadro T1000Mobile
Compare
P2000 MobileQuadro P2000Mobile
Compare
P3000 MobileQuadro P3000Mobile
Compare
T600 MobileQuadro T600Mobile
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro T2000 Max-Q according to our statistics.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.5 51 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro T2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.