Quadro P4200 vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.83

P4200 outperforms P620 by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking484233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.1717.11
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP107GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5122304
Core clock speed1177 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18237.2
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 8.83
Quadro P4200 23.36
+165%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3665
Quadro P4200 10729
+193%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 12086
Quadro P4200 39050
+223%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P620 11727
Quadro P4200 37676
+221%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
−155%
120−130
+155%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−189%
130−140
+189%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−206%
45−50
+206%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−189%
130−140
+189%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−169%
75−80
+169%
Fortnite 113
−3.5%
110−120
+3.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−206%
45−50
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−188%
90−95
+188%
Valorant 85−90
−87.4%
160−170
+87.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−189%
130−140
+189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−86.1%
250−260
+86.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%
Dota 2 90
−34.4%
120−130
+34.4%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−169%
75−80
+169%
Fortnite 42
−179%
110−120
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−153%
85−90
+153%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−206%
45−50
+206%
Metro Exodus 17
−206%
50−55
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−188%
90−95
+188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−119%
70−75
+119%
Valorant 85−90
−87.4%
160−170
+87.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−183%
50−55
+183%
Dota 2 83
−45.8%
120−130
+45.8%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−169%
75−80
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−141%
90−95
+141%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−206%
45−50
+206%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−188%
90−95
+188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Valorant 85−90
−87.4%
160−170
+87.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 29
−303%
110−120
+303%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−225%
50−55
+225%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−258%
40−45
+258%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−210%
30−35
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−272%
170−180
+272%
Valorant 100−105
−103%
200−210
+103%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−214%
65−70
+214%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−179%
50−55
+179%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−190%
60−65
+190%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−189%
24−27
+189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−200%
35−40
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−195%
55−60
+195%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−120%
40−45
+120%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−400%
20−22
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Valorant 45−50
−200%
130−140
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Dota 2 30−35
−136%
75−80
+136%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−180%
40−45
+180%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−275%
14−16
+275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%

This is how Quadro P620 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 155% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed Quadro P620 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.83 23.36
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Quadro P4200, on the other hand, has a 164.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 673 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 59 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.