Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
26.62

AI PRO R9700 outperforms P5200 by a whopping 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking22512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.4219.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1556 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4747.5
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs160256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache960 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 26.62
AI PRO R9700 74.31
+179%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 Samples: 188 11771
AI PRO R9700 Samples: 7 32859
+179%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P5200 39589
AI PRO R9700 184684
+367%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120
−150%
300−350
+150%
4K48
−171%
130−140
+171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−148%
400−450
+148%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−178%
300−310
+178%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−148%
400−450
+148%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%
Fortnite 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−168%
300−310
+168%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−178%
250−260
+178%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
Valorant 180−190
−170%
500−550
+170%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−178%
300−310
+178%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
−148%
400−450
+148%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−177%
750−800
+177%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Dota 2 130−140
−165%
350−400
+165%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%
Fortnite 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−168%
300−310
+168%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
−178%
250−260
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
−177%
280−290
+177%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−177%
180−190
+177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
−154%
300−310
+154%
Valorant 180−190
−170%
500−550
+170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−178%
300−310
+178%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Dota 2 130−140
−165%
350−400
+165%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−172%
250−260
+172%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−168%
300−310
+168%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
−179%
170−180
+179%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
−163%
300−310
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−177%
180−190
+177%
Valorant 180−190
−170%
500−550
+170%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−161%
350−400
+161%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−166%
170−180
+166%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
−175%
550−600
+175%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−157%
450−500
+157%
Valorant 220−230
−170%
600−650
+170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−169%
210−220
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−169%
180−190
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−176%
210−220
+176%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−165%
130−140
+165%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−168%
190−200
+168%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−168%
150−160
+168%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−161%
120−130
+161%
Valorant 170−180
−163%
450−500
+163%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Dota 2 90−95
−178%
250−260
+178%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−171%
95−100
+171%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%

This is how Quadro P5200 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 171% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.62 74.31
Recency 21 February 2018 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P5200 has 200% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 179.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 107 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.