Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
20.42

AI PRO R9700 outperforms P3200 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.7718.11
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1328 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8747.5
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P3200 20.42
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+249%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8558
AI PRO R9700 29830
+249%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
−245%
290−300
+245%
4K28
−239%
95−100
+239%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−239%
400−450
+239%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
God of War 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−241%
290−300
+241%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−239%
400−450
+239%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Far Cry 5 79
−242%
270−280
+242%
Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 95
−216%
300−310
+216%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−248%
230−240
+248%
God of War 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−238%
270−280
+238%
Valorant 150−160
−229%
500−550
+229%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−241%
290−300
+241%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−239%
400−450
+239%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−232%
800−850
+232%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Dota 2 119
−236%
400−450
+236%
Far Cry 5 74
−238%
250−260
+238%
Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−241%
300−310
+241%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−248%
230−240
+248%
God of War 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−238%
260−270
+238%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−238%
270−280
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
−245%
290−300
+245%
Valorant 150−160
−229%
500−550
+229%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−241%
290−300
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−233%
150−160
+233%
Dota 2 112
−213%
350−400
+213%
Far Cry 5 70
−243%
240−250
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 72
−247%
250−260
+247%
God of War 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−238%
270−280
+238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
−248%
160−170
+248%
Valorant 150−160
−229%
500−550
+229%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−227%
350−400
+227%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−226%
140−150
+226%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−233%
500−550
+233%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−233%
90−95
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−247%
600−650
+247%
Valorant 180−190
−246%
650−700
+246%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−239%
200−210
+239%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−225%
65−70
+225%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−240%
160−170
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−246%
180−190
+246%
God of War 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−233%
110−120
+233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−247%
170−180
+247%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−242%
130−140
+242%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−224%
55−60
+224%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−239%
95−100
+239%
Valorant 120−130
−233%
400−450
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−244%
110−120
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Dota 2 70−75
−243%
240−250
+243%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−233%
120−130
+233%
God of War 16−18
−244%
55−60
+244%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−233%
70−75
+233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
−241%
75−80
+241%

This is how Quadro P3200 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 245% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 239% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.42 71.19
Recency 21 February 2018 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 300% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 248.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 329 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.