Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.43no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD102Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2023 (1 year ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128004096
Core clock speed1155 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2550 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate1,020747.5
Floating-point processing power65.28 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs176128
TMUs400256
Tensor Cores400128
Ray Tracing Cores10064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 20% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between RTX 5000 Ada Generation and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 89 votes

Rate RTX 5000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX 5000 Ada Generation or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.