Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking851not rated
Place by popularity34not in top-100
Power efficiency12.25no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924096
Core clock speed300 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors189 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00747.5
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs3128
TMUs24256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has 1900% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4861 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 620 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.