P5000 Mobile vs P5200

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro P5200
32.00
+7.3%

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking159172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.465.55
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104N17E-Q5
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years old)11 January 2017 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,885
Current price$3894 $2137 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P5000 Mobile has 60% better value for money than Quadro P5200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602048
Core clock speed1316 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate279.4202.5
Floating-point performanceno data6,197 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 and Quadro P5000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7216 MHz6006 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 32.00
+7.3%
P5000 Mobile 29.83

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P5200 12400
+7.3%
P5000 Mobile 11561

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 65844
+47.3%
P5000 Mobile 44689

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 47% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro P5200 25100
+24.9%
P5000 Mobile 20096

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 25% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 18467
+25.9%
P5000 Mobile 14666

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 26% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro P5200 106328
+22.7%
P5000 Mobile 86679

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 23% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 146
+47.8%
P5000 Mobile 99

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 48% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 206
+29.5%
P5000 Mobile 159

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 29% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 216
+28.4%
P5000 Mobile 168

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 193
+28.2%
P5000 Mobile 150

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 156
+23.5%
P5000 Mobile 126

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 79
+21.3%
P5000 Mobile 65

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Quadro P5200 75
+12.1%
P5000 Mobile 67

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 12% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 75
+12.2%
P5000 Mobile 67

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 12% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 146
+47.9%
P5000 Mobile 99

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 48% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 193
+28.2%
P5000 Mobile 150

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 206
+29.5%
P5000 Mobile 159

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 29% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 216
+28.4%
P5000 Mobile 168

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 28% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 156
+23.5%
P5000 Mobile 126

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Quadro P5200 79
+21.3%
P5000 Mobile 65

P5200 outperforms P5000 Mobile by 21% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+8.2%
110−120
−8.2%
4K48
+20%
40−45
−20%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
Hitman 3 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
+13.8%
80−85
−13.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+7.5%
80−85
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
Hitman 3 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+10%
50−55
−10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+11.4%
70−75
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+18%
100−105
−18%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+8.9%
90−95
−8.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+8%
75−80
−8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+7.4%
95−100
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Hitman 3 55−60
+12%
50−55
−12%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+7.7%
65−70
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+10.9%
55−60
−10.9%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+15%
40−45
−15%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

This is how Quadro P5200 and P5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P5200 is 8.2% faster than P5000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • Quadro P5200 is 20% faster than P5000 Mobile

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 32.00 29.83
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 100 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5200 and Quadro P5000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Quadro P5000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 81 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 83 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.