T1000 Mobile vs P4200

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Quadro P4200
25.03
+48.3%

P4200 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 48% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking195296
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money7.544.12
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP104N19P-Q1
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 May 2018 (5 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$1526 $1890
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4200 has 83% better value for money than T1000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304768
Core clock speed1215 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate237.269.84

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P4200 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7132 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4200 25.03
+48.3%
T1000 Mobile 16.88

P4200 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 48% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P4200 10522
+60.9%
T1000 Mobile 6540

P4200 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 61% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+40.6%
64
−40.6%
4K70−75
+45.8%
48
−45.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+2.1%
48
−2.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+35%
60
−35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+8.2%
61
−8.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+6.5%
62
−6.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+37.5%
48
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+40.7%
55−60
−40.7%
Hitman 3 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+50%
35−40
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−14.6%
47
+14.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−3.6%
57
+3.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+14%
43
−14%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+55.8%
52
−55.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+40.4%
47
−40.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+15.8%
57
−15.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+43.5%
46
−43.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+40.7%
55−60
−40.7%
Hitman 3 75−80
+59.6%
45−50
−59.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+50%
35−40
−50%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+23.5%
34
−23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+64%
25
−64%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+14.6%
48
−14.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−10.5%
63
+10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+69%
29
−69%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+72.3%
47
−72.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+24.5%
53
−24.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+53.5%
43
−53.5%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+40.7%
55−60
−40.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+62.9%
35
−62.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%
Hitman 3 40−45
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+66.7%
14−16
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+55.6%
35−40
−55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+53.6%
27−30
−53.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+52.2%
21−24
−52.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

This is how Quadro P4200 and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P4200 is 40.6% faster than T1000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • Quadro P4200 is 45.8% faster than T1000 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 100% faster than the T1000 Mobile.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Mobile is 14.6% faster than the Quadro P4200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 65 tests (96%)
  • T1000 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 25.03 16.88
Recency 7 May 2018 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro T1000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 44 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 129 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.