Quadro T600 Mobile vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 and Quadro T600 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
24.93
+37.4%

P4200 outperforms T600 Mobile by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
T600 Mobile Quadro T600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.2931.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed1227 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate237.278.96
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS2.527 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P4200 24.93
+37.4%
T600 Mobile 18.15

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10729
+51.9%
T600 Mobile 7062

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+37.3%
51
−37.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+28.8%
70−75
−28.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+49.1%
53
−49.1%
Fortnite 110−120
+25.8%
90−95
−25.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+32.4%
70−75
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+39.6%
45−50
−39.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+43.8%
60−65
−43.8%
Valorant 160−170
+21.6%
130−140
−21.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+28.8%
70−75
−28.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+17.5%
210−220
−17.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Dota 2 120−130
+4.3%
116
−4.3%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+61.2%
49
−61.2%
Fortnite 110−120
+25.8%
90−95
−25.8%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+32.4%
70−75
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+39.6%
45−50
−39.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+36.5%
63
−36.5%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+44.4%
35−40
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+43.8%
60−65
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+34.6%
52
−34.6%
Valorant 160−170
+21.6%
130−140
−21.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+28.8%
70−75
−28.8%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Dota 2 120−130
+13.1%
107
−13.1%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+75.6%
45
−75.6%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+32.4%
70−75
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+43.8%
60−65
−43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+150%
28
−150%
Valorant 160−170
+48.2%
110−120
−48.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+25.8%
90−95
−25.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+32.5%
120−130
−32.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+48.3%
27−30
−48.3%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+45.8%
120−130
−45.8%
Valorant 200−210
+20.8%
160−170
−20.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+34.7%
45−50
−34.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+42.1%
35−40
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+41.9%
40−45
−41.9%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+43.6%
35−40
−43.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Valorant 130−140
+43.8%
95−100
−43.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+38.5%
24−27
−38.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Dota 2 75−80
+30%
60−65
−30%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+52.9%
16−18
−52.9%

1440p
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how Quadro P4200 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 37% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 44 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.93 18.15
Recency 21 February 2018 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 37.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T600 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA Quadro T600 Mobile
Quadro T600
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Plus Graphics 655
GT 1030 GK107 GeForce GT 1030 GK107
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Plus Graphics 655
HD Graphics 505 HD Graphics 505
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Plus Graphics 655
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
vs
Vega 11 Embedded Vega 11 Embedded
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
RTX 3060 3840SP RTX 3060 3840SP
vs
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Max-Q
vs
RX 580X Radeon RX 580X
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
GTX 950 Low Power GTX 950 Low Power
vs
RTX 4090 4090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.6 58 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate Quadro T600 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or Quadro T600 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.