GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs Quadro P620

Place in the ranking	474	99
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	16.41	15.52
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU106
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2018 (7 years ago)	7 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	2176
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	1443 MHz	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	184 Watt
Texture fill rate	46.18	224.4
Floating-point processing power	1.478 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	48
TMUs	32	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	229 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P620 9.14

RTX 2060 12 GB 39.77
+335%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3660

RTX 2060 12 GB 15924
+335%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−317%

200−210
+317%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −312%	70−75 +312%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −321%	80−85 +321%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −319%	130−140 +319%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −312%	70−75 +312%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −321%	80−85 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	100−105 +300%
Valorant	35−40 −317%	150−160 +317%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −319%	130−140 +319%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −312%	70−75 +312%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −321%	80−85 +321%
Dota 2	30 −333%	130−140 +333%
Far Cry 5	64 −322%	270−280 +322%
Fortnite	55−60 −329%	240−250 +329%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −312%	140−150 +312%
Metro Exodus	6 −300%	24−27 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	125 −300%	500−550 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −300%	100−105 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −314%	120−130 +314%
Valorant	35−40 −317%	150−160 +317%
World of Tanks	130−140 −332%	600−650 +332%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −319%	130−140 +319%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −312%	70−75 +312%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −321%	80−85 +321%
Dota 2	83 −322%	350−400 +322%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −310%	160−170 +310%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −332%	160−170 +332%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −305%	300−310 +305%
Valorant	35−40 −317%	150−160 +317%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −332%	190−200 +332%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
World of Tanks	65−70 −326%	290−300 +326%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −317%	75−80 +317%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Forza Horizon 5	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −317%	75−80 +317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Valorant	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −329%	120−130 +329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Dota 2	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
Fortnite	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Forza Horizon 5	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Valorant	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%

This is how Quadro P620 and RTX 2060 12 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 12 GB is 317% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.14	39.77
Recency	1 February 2018	7 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	184 Watt

Quadro P620 has 360% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 335.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Quadro P620

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P620

Radeon Pro 560X

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 640 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.4 1162 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.