AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P3200
23.47
+51.7%

Quadro P3200 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking216318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.733.64
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN18E-Q1Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 February 2017 (7 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$2122 $2068
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P3200 has 2% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921280
Core clock speed708 - 1202 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8100.0

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 23.47
+51.7%
Pro 5300M 15.47

Quadro P3200 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 52% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P3200 9097
+51.7%
Pro 5300M 5996

Quadro P3200 outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M by 52% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+54.5%
55−60
−54.5%
4K28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+103%
30−35
−103%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+45.3%
50−55
−45.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 79
+97.5%
40−45
−97.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+47.6%
40−45
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+75.9%
50−55
−75.9%
Hitman 3 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
+96.9%
30−35
−96.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+75%
30−35
−75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+45.3%
50−55
−45.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 74
+85%
40−45
−85%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+47.6%
40−45
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+63%
50−55
−63%
Hitman 3 70−75
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+65.6%
30−35
−65.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+155%
30−35
−155%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+25%
30−35
−25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+57.7%
24−27
−57.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+45.3%
50−55
−45.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Far Cry 5 70
+75%
40−45
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+47.6%
40−45
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+33.3%
50−55
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+39.4%
30−35
−39.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Hitman 3 35−40
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+55%
20−22
−55%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+76.9%
12−14
−76.9%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+57.6%
30−35
−57.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+60%
24−27
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+55.2%
27−30
−55.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+60%
30−33
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

This is how Quadro P3200 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro P3200 is 54.5% faster than Pro 5300M

4K resolution:

  • Quadro P3200 is 55.6% faster than Pro 5300M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 155% faster than the Pro 5300M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P3200 surpassed Pro 5300M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 23.47 15.47
Recency 27 February 2017 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 65 Watt

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 231 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 158 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.