Radeon Pro W5500M vs Quadro P3200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 and Radeon Pro W5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.21
+152%

P3200 outperforms Pro W5500M by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking256491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.807.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)10 February 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921408
Core clock speed1328 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8127.6
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS4.083 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P3200 22.21
+152%
Pro W5500M 8.82

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8740
+152%
Pro W5500M 3469

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+180%
30−35
−180%
4K28
+180%
10−12
−180%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+190%
30−33
−190%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Far Cry 5 79
+163%
30−33
−163%
Fortnite 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+171%
35−40
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+173%
30−33
−173%
Valorant 150−160
+155%
60−65
−155%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+190%
30−33
−190%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+157%
95−100
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Dota 2 119
+164%
45−50
−164%
Far Cry 5 74
+174%
27−30
−174%
Fortnite 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+193%
30−33
−193%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+173%
30−33
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+180%
30−33
−180%
Valorant 150−160
+155%
60−65
−155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+190%
30−33
−190%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+156%
18−20
−156%
Dota 2 112
+180%
40−45
−180%
Far Cry 5 70
+159%
27−30
−159%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+167%
27−30
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+173%
30−33
−173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Valorant 150−160
+155%
60−65
−155%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+173%
40−45
−173%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+153%
60−65
−153%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+168%
65−70
−168%
Valorant 190−200
+156%
75−80
−156%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+186%
21−24
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+167%
18−20
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+192%
12−14
−192%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+180%
10−11
−180%
Valorant 120−130
+173%
45−50
−173%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Dota 2 70−75
+167%
27−30
−167%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%

This is how Quadro P3200 and Pro W5500M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 180% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 180% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.21 8.82
Recency 21 February 2018 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 85 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 151.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5500M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 308 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 or Radeon Pro W5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.