FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 and FirePro W8100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.26

W8100 outperforms P2000 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking307305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.41no data
Power efficiency17.125.89
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGP106Hawaii
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)23 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1076 MHz824 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72131.8
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS4.219 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs64160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length201 mm279 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s320 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
StereoOutput3D-+
DisplayPort countno data4
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 16.26
FirePro W8100 16.41
+0.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
FirePro W8100 7332
+0.9%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P2000 22897
FirePro W8100 34705
+51.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
1440p20
+11.1%
18−21
−11.1%
4K16
+0%
16−18
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45no data
1440p29.25no data
4K36.56no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Fortnite 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Dota 2 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
Far Cry 5 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Fortnite 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Dota 2 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+3.1%
160−170
−3.1%
Valorant 170−180
+0.6%
170−180
−0.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Quadro P2000 and FirePro W8100 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.26 16.41
Recency 6 February 2017 23 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 220 Watt

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 193.3% lower power consumption.

FirePro W8100, on the other hand, has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 and FirePro W8100.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD FirePro W8100
FirePro W8100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 670 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate FirePro W8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or FirePro W8100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.