Radeon Pro W5500X vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro W5500 Radeon Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro W5500X, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.86

Pro W5500X outperforms P2000 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
Pro W5500X Pro W5500X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking304301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.9021.58
Power efficiency17.3010.50
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP106Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)11 December 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Pro W5500X has 118% better value for money than Quadro P2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241536
Core clock speed1076 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1757 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate94.72168.7
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs6496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P2000 18.86
Pro W5500X 19.08
+1.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
Pro W5500X 7350
+1.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
1440p20
+11.1%
18−21
−11.1%
4K16
+0%
16−18
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.45
+4.3%
10.89
−4.3%
1440p29.25
+13.8%
33.28
−13.8%
4K36.56
+2.4%
37.44
−2.4%
  • Quadro P2000 and Pro W5500X have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 has 14% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Quadro P2000 and Pro W5500X have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Fortnite 144
+2.9%
140−150
−2.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0.5%
220−230
−0.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Dota 2 102
+2%
100−105
−2%
Far Cry 5 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Fortnite 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+3.1%
65−70
−3.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+5.7%
70−75
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Dota 2 98
+3.2%
95−100
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+4.3%
70−75
−4.3%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Valorant 130−140
+4.6%
130−140
−4.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−0.8%
130−140
+0.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+5%
160−170
−5%
Valorant 170−180
+1.2%
170−180
−1.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Quadro P2000 and Pro W5500X compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2000 is 2% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P2000 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.86 19.08
Recency 6 February 2017 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 125 Watt

Quadro P2000 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500X, on the other hand, has a 1.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro W5500X.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
FirePro W8100 FirePro W8100
Pro W5500X Radeon Pro W5500X
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
Pro 5300 Radeon Pro 5300
FirePro A300 A300
vs
M3000 SE M3000 SE
9800M GT 9800M GT
vs
Quadro P5200 P5200
GTX 1050 GTX 1050
vs
Quadro P5200 P5200
HD 7770 HD 7770
vs
RX 7600 RX 7600
ATI HD 2400 XT HD 2400 XT
vs
GT 240 GT 240
HD 8240 HD 8240
vs
9800M GTS 9800M GTS
HD 6450M HD 6450M
vs
GTS 160M GTS 160M
W7170M W7170M
vs
Quadro P5200 P5200
ATI 3100 Mobile IGP 3100 Mobile IGP
vs
GTS 260M GTS 260M
HD 8470 OEM HD 8470 OEM
vs
8400M GS 8400M GS

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 665 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Radeon Pro W5500X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.