NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs M4000M
Comparison of Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
59.2 GTexel / s
78 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
80.19 GB / s
160 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision Pro
nView Display Management
APIs supported by Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 12 (FL 12_1), Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
M4000M 24.61 +7.1%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
M4000M 49204 +60.2%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
M4000M 6937 +53.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
M4000M 7723 +61.3%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
M4000M 10259 +71%
M4000M 4816 +9%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Much newer (1 February 2017 vs 2 October 2015)
More pipelines (512 vs 1)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (47 vs 100 watts)
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
7.1% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (160 vs 80.19 GB/s)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, Quadro P1000 or M4000M?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro P1000 and Quadro M4000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.