NVIDIA Quadro K4100M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 323$
Games supported 70%
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Buy
  • Interface MXM-B (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 706
  • Max video memory 4GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 3200
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 740$
Games supported 68%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating421450
Value for money2.455.13
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameN15E-Q3-A2Polaris 12
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (8 years ago)26 September 2019 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $199
Price now$323 (0.2x MSRP)$740 (3.7x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152no data
Core clock speed706 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate67.7841.44
Floating-point performance1,627 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K4100M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed3200 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
Display Port1.2no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12no data
Shader Model56.4
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K4100M 9.37
+12.2%
Pro WX 3200 8.35
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • Passmark

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K4100M 24685
+30.8%
Pro WX 3200 18866
K4100M 3505
+22.1%
Pro WX 3200 2871

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K4100M 3654
+15.8%
Pro WX 3200 3156

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K4100M 4957
+14.3%
Pro WX 3200 4338

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K4100M 19909
+58.8%
Pro WX 3200 12538
K4100M 59
+46.3%
Pro WX 3200 40
K4100M 59
+46.3%
Pro WX 3200 40
K4100M 43
+35.6%
Pro WX 3200 32
K4100M 23
+31.6%
Pro WX 3200 18
K4100M 43
+35.6%
Pro WX 3200 32
K4100M 12
+46.9%
Pro WX 3200 8
K4100M 35
+60.9%
Pro WX 3200 22
K4100M 23
+31.6%
Pro WX 3200 18
K4100M 1.9
+18.8%
Pro WX 3200 1.6
K4100M 35
+1.5%
Pro WX 3200 34
K4100M 45
+62.3%
Pro WX 3200 28
K4100M 12
+46.9%
Pro WX 3200 8

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

K4100M 35
+60.9%
Pro WX 3200 22
K4100M 1.9
+18.8%
Pro WX 3200 1.6
K4100M 35
+1.5%
Pro WX 3200 34
K4100M 45
+62.3%
Pro WX 3200 28

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K4100M 2756
+12.3%
Pro WX 3200 2455

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K4100M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 51 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
+167%
18
−167%
4K13
+85.7%
7
−85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−122%
20
+122%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−100%
18
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−66.7%
15
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−88.9%
17
+88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−11.1%
10
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+80%
5
−80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 9.37 8.35
Novelty 23 July 2013 26 September 2019
Cost $1499 $199
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro K4100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro K4100M by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro K4100M from AMD is Radeon Pro 450, which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K4100M:

Competitors of Radeon Pro WX 3200 by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon Pro WX 3200's NVIDIA equivalent is GRID K240Q, which is faster by 3% and higher by 8 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GRID K240Q GRID K240Q
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro WX 3200:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 42 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K4100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 40 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.