NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

General info

Comparison of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
Value for money (0-100)
GCN 4.0
Code name
Polaris 23
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2012
2 July 2019
Launch price (MSRP)
Price now

Technical specs

Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
601 MHz
1295 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
65 Watt
Texture fill rate
Floating-point performance
1,615 gflops
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size
medium sized
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
no data


Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort


Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
no data
HDMI 2.0
no data

API support

APIs supported by Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200, sometimes including their particular versions.
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

K5000M 6.49
Pro WX 3200 6.54 +0.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

K5000M 23061 +22.2%
Pro WX 3200 18866

3DMark Fire Strike Score

K5000M 2735
Pro WX 3200 2871 +5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

K5000M 2798
Pro WX 3200 3156 +12.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

K5000M 4893 +12.8%
Pro WX 3200 4338

3DMark Vantage Performance

K5000M 20139 +60.6%
Pro WX 3200 12538


K5000M 2572
Pro WX 3200 2591 +0.7%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1344 vs 640)
Higher memory bandwidth (96 vs 64 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Optimus Support

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

0.8% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (2 July 2019 vs 7 August 2012)
Cheaper ($199 vs $329.99)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (65 vs 100 watts)
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
HDMI 2.0

So, Quadro K5000M or Pro WX 3200?

Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K5000M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite video card.
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the video card, as well as rate it yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Quadro K5000M or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.