NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Comparison of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
APIs supported by Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
Pro WX 3200 6.54 +0.8%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
K5000M 23061 +22.2%
Pro WX 3200 18866
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Pro WX 3200 2871 +5%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Pro WX 3200 3156 +12.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
K5000M 4893 +12.8%
Pro WX 3200 4338
3DMark Vantage Performance
K5000M 20139 +60.6%
Pro WX 3200 12538
Pro WX 3200 2591 +0.7%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
More pipelines (1344 vs 640)
Higher memory bandwidth (96 vs 64 GB/s)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
0.8% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (2 July 2019 vs 7 August 2012)
Cheaper ($199 vs $329.99)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (65 vs 100 watts)
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
So, Quadro K5000M or Pro WX 3200?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro K5000M and AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro K5000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.