RTX A2000 vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX 3050 Mobile
2022
4096 MB GDDR6
23.56

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking216132
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data18.71
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAmpere GA106GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current priceno data$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603328
Core clock speed1552 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate102.0124.8

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Mobile 23.56
RTX A2000 35.57
+51%

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
RTX A2000 13769
+50.9%

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 51% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
−50.5%
140−150
+50.5%
1440p50
−50%
75−80
+50%
4K32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 106
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
−46.7%
110−120
+46.7%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Far Cry 5 118
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
−45.5%
160−170
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 96
−45.8%
140−150
+45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 106
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−41.2%
120−130
+41.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Far Cry 5 107
−49.5%
160−170
+49.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 103
−45.6%
150−160
+45.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Hitman 3 70−75
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
−50.7%
110−120
+50.7%
Metro Exodus 62
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 87
−49.4%
130−140
+49.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
−48.8%
250−260
+48.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 73
−50.7%
110−120
+50.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−42.9%
110−120
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
−47.5%
90−95
+47.5%
Far Cry 5 99
−41.4%
140−150
+41.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 94
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−46.2%
95−100
+46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Hitman 3 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Horizon Zero Dawn 52
−44.2%
75−80
+44.2%
Metro Exodus 36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−46.6%
85−90
+46.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40
−50%
60−65
+50%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−50.9%
80−85
+50.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
Far Cry 5 68
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−45.8%
70−75
+45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Hitman 3 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Metro Exodus 23
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−50%
45−50
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
Far Cry 5 35
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−36.4%
45−50
+36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 50.5% faster than RTX 3050 Mobile in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 50% faster than RTX 3050 Mobile in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 is 40.6% faster than RTX 3050 Mobile in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 23.56 35.57
Recency 4 January 2022 10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3843 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 501 vote

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.