RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 3050 Mobile
23.53

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 8% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking214193
Place by popularity47not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAmpere GA106GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years old)12 April 2021 (2 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed1552 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate102.0108.6

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.68.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 Mobile 23.53
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.52
+8.5%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 8% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+21.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 21% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 3050 Mobile 21358
+18.3%
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 18% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3050 Mobile 15685
+19.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 19% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 3050 Mobile 90224
+49.5%
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 50% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 148
+54.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 96

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 54% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 59
RTX A2000 Mobile 142
+140%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 140% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 8
RTX A2000 Mobile 110
+1341%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 1341% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 55
RTX A2000 Mobile 135
+144%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 144% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 45
RTX A2000 Mobile 116
+159%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 159% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 36
RTX A2000 Mobile 45
+26.1%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 26% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 77
+10%
RTX A2000 Mobile 70

GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 10% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RTX 3050 Mobile 7
RTX A2000 Mobile 11
+48.6%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile by 49% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
+17.7%
79
−17.7%
1440p50
+22%
41
−22%
4K32
−18.8%
38
+18.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 106
+43.2%
74
−43.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+36.4%
55
−36.4%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.5%
80−85
+6.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−8.1%
65−70
+8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+33.9%
62
−33.9%
Far Cry 5 118
+22.9%
96
−22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
+52.8%
72
−52.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Hitman 3 70−75
−18.6%
83
+18.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 96
+39.1%
69
−39.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 106
+60.6%
66
−60.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
+37.1%
62
−37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
+59%
39
−59%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.5%
80−85
+6.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
−8.1%
65−70
+8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+22%
50
−22%
Far Cry 5 107
+21.6%
88
−21.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 103
+45.1%
71
−45.1%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
Hitman 3 70−75
−8.6%
76
+8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
+28.1%
57
−28.1%
Metro Exodus 62
+40.9%
44
−40.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 87
+45%
60
−45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+75%
96
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 73
+43.1%
51
−43.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+65.6%
32
−65.6%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−6.5%
80−85
+6.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+48.8%
41
−48.8%
Far Cry 5 99
+19.3%
83
−19.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 94
+59.3%
59
−59.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−7.6%
85−90
+7.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+30%
50
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+145%
29
−145%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−8.3%
35−40
+8.3%
Hitman 3 35−40
−23.1%
48
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 52
+26.8%
41
−26.8%
Metro Exodus 36
+33.3%
27
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+45%
40
−45%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−12%
27−30
+12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−7.5%
55−60
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+20%
25
−20%
Far Cry 5 68
+28.3%
53
−28.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
+40.8%
49
−40.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−8.3%
50−55
+8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−10.7%
30−35
+10.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+65%
20
−65%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Hitman 3 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Metro Exodus 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+76.5%
17
−76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+33.3%
33
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 35
+34.6%
26
−34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+48%
24−27
−48%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−9.1%
35−40
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%

This is how RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 17.7% faster than RTX A2000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 22% faster than RTX A2000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 18.8% faster than RTX 3050 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 145% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
  • in Hitman 3, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 23.1% faster than the RTX 3050 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 39 tests (57%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (43%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 23.53 25.52
Recency 4 January 2022 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3709 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 84 votes

Rate NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.