HD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile with HD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
38.54
+1143%

GTX 980 SLI Mobile outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 1143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking109721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation80.140.02
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLIKaby-Lake-H-GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 September 2015 (8 years ago)5 August 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price$301 $1449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile has 400600% better value for money than HD Graphics P630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409624
Core clock speed1126 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile and HD Graphics P630 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB1740 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.1.103
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD139
+1290%
10−12
−1290%
4K68
+1260%
5−6
−1260%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 30−35
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and HD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 1290% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 SLI Mobile is 1260% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.54 3.10
Recency 22 September 2015 5 August 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while HD Graphics P630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 65 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.