Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 965M with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 965M
2016
2 GB GDDR5
9.14

AI PRO R9700 outperforms GTX 965M by a whopping 679% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9518.11
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGM206SNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2016 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244096
Core clock speed944 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate73.60747.5
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 965M 9.14
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+679%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3832
AI PRO R9700 29830
+678%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−661%
350−400
+661%
1440p25
−660%
190−200
+660%
4K21
−662%
160−170
+662%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
God of War 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 52
−669%
400−450
+669%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Far Cry 5 38
−663%
290−300
+663%
Fortnite 55−60
−614%
400−450
+614%
Forza Horizon 4 47
−645%
350−400
+645%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
God of War 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
−661%
350−400
+661%
Valorant 90−95
−678%
700−750
+678%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
−598%
300−310
+598%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−600%
350−400
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
−675%
1100−1150
+675%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 84
−674%
650−700
+674%
Far Cry 5 35
−671%
270−280
+671%
Fortnite 34
−665%
260−270
+665%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−632%
300−310
+632%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−650%
210−220
+650%
God of War 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−665%
260−270
+665%
Metro Exodus 15
−633%
110−120
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38
−663%
290−300
+663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−674%
240−250
+674%
Valorant 90−95
−678%
700−750
+678%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
−671%
270−280
+671%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
Dota 2 77
−614%
550−600
+614%
Far Cry 5 32
−650%
240−250
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 28
−650%
210−220
+650%
God of War 18−20
−637%
140−150
+637%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−669%
200−210
+669%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−678%
140−150
+678%
Valorant 90−95
−678%
700−750
+678%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 34
−665%
260−270
+665%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−665%
130−140
+665%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−675%
550−600
+675%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−669%
100−105
+669%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%
Valorant 100−110
−677%
800−850
+677%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−639%
170−180
+639%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Far Cry 5 22
−673%
170−180
+673%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−673%
170−180
+673%
God of War 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−650%
90−95
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 19
−637%
140−150
+637%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−669%
100−105
+669%
Valorant 45−50
−629%
350−400
+629%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Dota 2 44
−582%
300−310
+582%
Far Cry 5 10
−650%
75−80
+650%
Forza Horizon 4 14
−614%
100−105
+614%
God of War 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4
−650%
30−33
+650%

This is how GTX 965M and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 661% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 660% faster in 1440p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 662% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.14 71.19
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

AI PRO R9700 has a 678.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 965M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
GeForce GTX 965M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.